|
This was our January 2001 mailer. It was published
in the February 5th issue of Brand Week Magazine.
(To subscribe to the list, you must send a blank message to Jacques.JPGroup-subscribe@topica.com. It is free.)
Thoughts about the demise of the Oldsmobile brand
So, the Olds brand will be discontinued. The powers that be at GM have decided that the division's dwindling market share trend could not be reversed. As many have pointed out, the brand has "Old" in its name. That is supposed to pigeonhole the brand as one for an older affluent target. The company tried very hard to change its older image, pointing out how the cars weren't "your father's Oldsmobile" and even selling models with no outside brand identification. To no avail.
And why is "old" a bad thing? Because, we're told, even mature customers do not like to be marketed to as "old." As to the younger ones, if you're seen as "old," forget it: you will not sell them a thing.
Interestingly, it is young people who usually preach this paedocentric vision of the world. And they say that at a time when America's population is aging and is more affluent than ever before. I, for one, do not buy the notion that there was an inherent disadvantage in the Oldsmobile brand name. "Old" was in the name well before I was born and hasn't prevented the brand from being successful in the past.
The decline of the brand is more likely tied to a product line that's been devoid of innovation coupled with poor brand management.
In a brand's gestalt, all elements including product design, quality, performance, image and communication, contribute to creating and nurturing a brand profile. One can change some of the elements providing that the consumer continues to recognize that the same brand values are still present after the change. But, once your brand is known for being innovative, innovation becomes one of its values. Abandoning a value will alter the brand forever. When it ceased to be innovative, Oldsmobile betrayed its brand values and weakened its brand.
The problem they encountered is that brands, particularly brands with a well-established image, cannot be repositioned. At best they may be nudged slowly in a new direction but not one that is the antithesis of what it stood for. From old to a bit less old, yes. From old to young, no way!
As we all know, a brand consists of the values that consumers attach to it. But it is more that just a set of interchangeable values. It is the predictability with which those values will always be associated with the brand; it is how dear the set of values is to the brand. In short, it is the character of the brand. Character is having values and sticking to them.
|
Add to that the risk of antagonizing an audience that's been attracted to a brand because of its previous set of values... That's why it maybe easier and wiser just to create a whole new brand with its own character rather than to change the fundamentals of an existing one.But creating a whole new brand is expensive, risky and not always financially viable. And there remains the issue of what to do with the brand you already own even if it has a profile you disapprove of. A better solution, and a more unique approach, would have been to accept the brand as it was, with its older profile, and give its older customers a product they wanted to own with a message that appealed to their needs. In addition to capitalizing on the existing profile of the brand, that strategy would have taken advantage of the growing number of mature Americans and their increased spending power.
By Jacques Chevron |
| Jump directly to an article or presentation: |
| Site Summary: (What we do: [Strategic Branding] [New Product Development and Positioning] [International Capabilities]) (Who we are: [Associates] [Jacques Chevron] [Client Experience]) (Articles and presentations: [Branding related] [New Product related] [On other topics] [Articles in Foreign Languages]) (Miscellaneous: [Favorite Links] [Contact us]) |